U.S. Department of Justice to File Criminal Contempt Charge Against Joe Arpaio

Oct 4, 2017:

Sep 14, 2017:

Aug 25, 2017:

President Trump pardoned Joe Arpaio.

Jul 31, 2017:

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton issued a verdict of guilty in Arpaio's criminal contempt of court case. The sentencing phase of the trial is scheduled to begin October 5.

Jul 7, 2017:

Closing arguments in Arpaio's criminal contempt of court case were heard today.

Jun 26, 2017:

Arpaio's criminal contempt of court case starts today.

Oct 28, 2016:

Sheriff Joe Arpaio entered a plea of not guilty in his criminal contempt of court case.

Oct 25, 2016:

U.S. District Court Judge Susan Bolton signed an order which officially charges Sheriff Joe Arpaio with criminal contempt of court.

Oct 11, 2016:

The U.S. Department of Justice announced it will charge 84-year-old Maricopa County (Arizona) Sheriff Joe Arpaio with criminal contempt of court for violating a court order to stop his practice of illegal racial profiling. If convicted, Arpaio could serve up to six months in jail. Arpaio is currently seeking his seventh term in office.

Arpaio made a statement in which he said:

My point is this was strictly a political attack on this sheriff in this campaign.

I am not going to surrender. I am going to fight this all the way. And I expect to be re-elected.

Source:

Cassidy, Megan; Náñez, Dianna M.; Kiefer, Michael. (October 11, 2016). "Federal government to pursue criminal-contempt charge against Sheriff Joe Arpaio; he vows to fight". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved 2016-10-12.

Arpaio, two aides, and a defense attorney are also being investigated for concealing evidence and obstruction of justice.

Aug 19, 2016:

In Phoenix, Arizona, U.S. District Court Judge G. Murray Snow ruled that Sheriff Joe Arpaio intentionally disregarded previous court orders regarding racial profiling and should be prosecuted for criminal contempt of court.

In his recommendation Snow said:

The test is not whether the testimony was perjurious or false but whether without the aid of extrinsic evidence the testimony is so plainly inconsistent, so manifestly contradictory, and so conspicuously unbelievable as to make it apparent from the face of the record itself that the witness has deliberately concealed the truth and has given answers which are replies in form only and which, in substance, are as useless as a complete refusal to answer.

Snow also ruled that Chief Deputy Jerry Sheridan, Arpaio's former defense attorney Michele Iafrate, and Captain Steve Bailey should be considered for prosecution as well.

Over the past nine years this racial profiling case has cost Maricopa county taxpayers $54 million, most of which was for attorney fees and the cost of implementing Judge Snow's orders.

More:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *